• The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) actively promotes SNAP restrictions and Medicaid cuts through state-level legislation, aiming to reduce reliance on government aid.
• FGA's strategies include drafting legislation, providing talking points, and using targeted data to influence policymakers, with a focus on conservative states.
• Critics argue FGA's policies create hurdles for those needing aid, while proponents claim they save tax dollars and incentivize self-sufficiency.

The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA), a conservative policy think tank based in Florida, is actively engaged in reshaping public assistance programs across the United States. The FGA advocates for stricter eligibility requirements and restrictions on programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid. Their efforts involve drafting legislation, providing talking points to policymakers, and using data to support their arguments. While proponents claim these policies save tax dollars and encourage self-sufficiency, critics argue they create unnecessary hurdles for individuals and families in need of assistance.

• What: The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) is working to reshape public assistance programs by advocating for stricter eligibility requirements and restrictions on food aid and healthcare benefits.
• Who: Key players include the Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA), state legislators, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and various advocacy groups.
• When: FGA was founded in 2011 and has been actively working to influence policies for over a decade. Recent efforts focus on the 'window of opportunity' in 2025 under the Trump administration and the Kennedy-led health department.
• Where: FGA's influence extends across multiple states, including Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Kansas, and Wyoming, as well as at the federal level in Washington, D.C.

The FGA's strategy of influencing state-level policies aims to create pressure for federal changes in public assistance programs. Their efforts are supported by conservative donors and involve drafting legislation, providing talking points, and using targeted data. While proponents argue these changes are necessary to reduce government dependency and save tax dollars, critics contend they create barriers for those in need and that a more effective approach would focus on addressing root causes such as poverty and lack of access to affordable healthcare and food.

We’re excited to fight from Topeka to Washington, D.C., as opposed to Washington, D.C., to Topeka.

They offer a buffet of options. Their agenda is making government accountable; it’s in the name.

Free millions from government dependency and open the doors for them to chase their own American Dream.

The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) is a significant player in the ongoing debate over public assistance programs in the United States. Their efforts to reshape SNAP and Medicaid policies are gaining traction in conservative states and may influence federal policy decisions. The debate over the effectiveness and impact of these policies is likely to continue as states and the federal government grapple with issues of poverty, healthcare access, and responsible use of taxpayer dollars.